Discussion:
success resolving after reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
alexus
2009-05-05 20:47:04 UTC
Permalink
the other problem im having is these:

May 5 20:44:57 dd named[21037]: success resolving
'92.68.83.189.zen.spamhaus.org/TXT' (in 'zen.spamhaus.org'?) after
reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets

i have followings in my named.conf

edns-udp-size 512;
max-udp-size 512;
Jeremy C. Reed
2009-05-05 21:56:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by alexus
May 5 20:44:57 dd named[21037]: success resolving
'92.68.83.189.zen.spamhaus.org/TXT' (in 'zen.spamhaus.org'?) after
reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
i have followings in my named.conf
edns-udp-size 512;
max-udp-size 512;
I don't see the problem. (The log message above says "success" and is
doing what you told it.)

Why do you have edns-udp-size and max-udp-size defined? Do you really need
them?
alexus
2009-05-05 21:57:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jeremy C. Reed
May  5 20:44:57 dd named[21037]: success resolving
'92.68.83.189.zen.spamhaus.org/TXT' (in 'zen.spamhaus.org'?) after
reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size to 512 octets
i have followings in my named.conf
      edns-udp-size 512;
      max-udp-size 512;
I don't see the problem. (The log message above says "success" and is
doing what you told it.)
Why do you have edns-udp-size and max-udp-size defined? Do you really need
them?
i thought if i'd had these i wouldn't see these msg in the logs
--
http://alexus.org/
Loading...